The Day After Tomorrow [Fox]

 

Do you know what your children are watching?

By NICK ZEGARAC

A while back some well-intentioned film critic wrote about "The Day After Tomorrow" that it was a clear case of a good film mired by bad science. I disagree. "The Day After Tomorrow" is nothing like a "good" film. You would think that after September 11th America's sick cinematic fascination with its own pulverization would have cooled down. Think again. Or don't think at all. That certainly works for director, Roland Emmerich and his new apocalyptic claptrap, "The Day After Tomorrow." I am still trying to glean the Freudian logic behind his twisted fetish for destroying New York City. If you recall, Emmerich also relished New York's decimation in "Independence Day" with aliens standing in for Mother Nature. "The Day After Tomorrow" is a weak "star vehicle" for Dennis Quaid who makes the least of his role as Jack Hall, a climatologist that nobody believes. Sela Ward is his estranged wife who, true to Hollywood cliché, melts like an ice cap after "hero" husband rescues their resourceful son (Jake Gyllenhaal). Just once I'd like some sane movie executive or screenwriter to explain to me why every couple in a disaster film embark as spiteful enemies but finish out the final reel like a twittering pair of reconciled love bunnies. Presumably, there's nothing like a billion tons of snow to bring two stubborn and evasive soul mates together. At last, something colder than their temperaments.

There's an absence of "good" sense in the way Emmerich allows all of his plot threads to ball up into minor and bothersome sequences of melodrama that play second fiddle to the special effects. For example, when self-sacrificing Laura Chapman (Emmy Rossum) gets blood poisoning from a leg wound she sustained while trying to save a South African mother and child from the raging flood waters (gee, why couldn't Emmerich have had the directorial huts-bah to go all out and make them quadriplegics too if he was going for the sympathy vote?) and is confined with a fever and chills in the New York Public Library, her impish but studly would-be boyfriend, Sam (Gyllenhaal) treks out to a Russian freighter in search of the penicillin that will save her life. But the administering of the drug is not the central issue of the sequence, so much as it serves as the spring board for a drawn out chase in which Sam and his loyal friends are almost mauled by a pack of ravenous wolves -- eat your heart out, Farley Mowat! All this schlock and "no sense" would make perfect "movie" sense if Emmerich's intentions of creating a "message" picture were not staked out in two feeble tack-ons: (1) that man is killing himself through his own stupidity and, for lack of a better explanation, needs to get in touch with his feminine side and become a kinder, gentler animal on and to this planet, and (2) that fossil fuels are bad. Well, duh!

If you're still interested in owning this film, Fox DVD delivers a pretty impressive looking image and sound quality. The anamorphically enhanced picture is beautifully rendered, with deep stylized colors, rich hues and solid blacks. Contrast levels are just low enough to mask the rather obvious digital effects that, at least in the theater, looked very "cut and paste" and cartoon-like. Edge enhancement is present but does not distract. The audio has an incredible kick in the base and a very natural sounding spread. Extras include two audio commentaries (neither particularly engaging), a sound demo and DVD-ROM junkets that, frankly, are a waste of your time.

» Buy the DVD


Ask us about exclusive sponsorships


©  Critics Inc. All rights reserved. See Terms of Use.

 

AMAZON.COM