F for Fake [Criterion]

 

Do you know what your children are watching?

By WAYNE KLEIN

Art is a lie that makes us feel good or at least recognize some of the truth. So much about art is an illusion and a hoax. So it's fitting that filmmaker, illusionist and prankster Orson Welles should make the art of illusion and hoaxes the central theme of his last complete film. "F for Fake" could be called a fictional documentary or a documentary about a couple of talented con men. Make no mistake, Welles's last film "F for Fake" isn't a great movie but, like all of Welles's films, it has enough greatest in it to make it worthwhile for fans of film and cinema. Welles begins his "documentary" (which, in and of itself spoofs the whole genre) looking at art forger Elmyr de Hory and his biographer Clifford Irving (who also penned the fraudulent Howard Hughes autobiography that raised such a ruckus during the 70's). Welles proceeds to examine what's "real" and "fake." Welles includes himself in this examination of how we lie to get what we need and why people are so inclined to believe a lie. Welles was well known for padding his resume in the theater at the beginning of his career and, of course, he masterminded the War of the Worlds radio program that caused panic (although how much panic is truly open to question and, again, is part of the deceit of showbiz) among the general public in the 1930's. This nonlinear film "essay" is fascinating but those watching it shouldn't expect a straight ahead narrative. The last complete film by Welles, "F for Fake" may not match the classic grandeur of "Citizen Kane," "The Magnificent Ambersons" or "Touch of Evil" but it has its own charms worth noting.

Criterion has done a splendid job of restoring a film that was shot on the cheap. Portions of the film have always been grainy as they were blown up from 16mm to match the 35 mm footage that Welles shot himself. The colors are brighter than the version of this film that I had seen in art theaters in the 80's and, while the mono sound doesn't have much presence, it sounds pretty decent overall. The sound comes across with nice clarity although it doesn't have much depth.

Criterion has done its usual thorough job putting together a nice package. Included as part of the package are two stunning documentaries on the films that Welles began but never finished (with tantalizing snippets from the unfinished "The Other Side of the Wind" starring John Huston) and a terrific documentary on art forger Elmyr de Hory. "Orson Welles: One-Man Band" made in 1988 examines the films that Welles began and abandoned or lost interest in during the last twenty years of his life. It's not a biography or even a career retrospective of the man but an examination of a truly restless spirit. I'd suggest that Welles had the equivalent of artistic Attention Deficit Disorder as he would start projects and interest and move on to the next project on a whim. By the way, if you plan on watching the movie don't watch the documentary first as it gives away a number of twists and turns in "the plot."

The Norwegian Film Institute documentary on Elmyr de Hory is almost as fascinating as the documentary on Welles. It's clear that Welles felt a kinship with Clifford Irving and De Hory feeling as if his career had been little more than an illusion. He really had no career per se. Welles was a polymath of sorts. De Hory demonstrated a lot of flair as a painter early on in his career but found his niche in creating nearly perfect forgeries of other artist's great works. In a sense, this documentary examines the psychology behind De Hory's desire and need to copy other artist's work. It's a fascinating glimpse into the pathology of deceit.

The video introduction by Bogdanovich provides interesting insight on Welles. I only wish that he had been asked to do a running commentary on the film in addition to Graver. Bogdanovich touches on some of the themes that are recurrent in Welles' work including the fact that the art of cinema is an illusion all its own and just as much a form of deceit as a forgery copying the elements of life without capturing the essence. He also discusses the making of the movie and how Welles integrated an unfinished documentary, re-edited and rearranged the movie to create a "documentary essay." Also of interest will be the 9-minute trailer for the film. It's essentially, an original short film by Welles incorporating footage from the film and features a brief parody of the "News on the March" footage from "Kane." Shot by Welles after the completion of the film, it's presented in black and white. The releasing studio decided not to put it into theaters, as it was so unconventional at the time.

The informative commentary by and star/co-writer Oja Kodar and director of photography Gary Graver ("The Clones," "I Spit on Your Corpse," "Countess Dracula's Orgy of Blood") whose career of shooting low budget horror films and exploitation films is appropriate to the very subject of this film gives considerable insight into Welles and his maverick methods as a film director. Although I would have preferred a commentary from Bogdanovich or, at the very least, the three working in tandem, Graver and Kodar between them have enough stories to keep the commentary track entertaining. Graver's comments about how Welles deliberately avoided anything that looked like a Welles shot indicated how much he wanted to continue to reinvent himself. Isn't reinvention a form, after all, of a hoax and forgery? Graver also discusses how hurt Welles was by Pauline Kael's nasty accusations that Welles had little to do with creating "Citizen Kane" and was no more than a mid-wife at the birth of a classic collaboration.

Don't be deceived this isn't one of Welles' best films by any stretch of the imagination nor is it a bad. It's an oddity with Welles pushing the boundaries of the documentary genre. Regardless, it's a fascinating bit of filmmaking using unusual editing techniques to tell a story about lies. Welles uses his charming personality and techniques as a film director to keep this film from becoming predictable. While it isn't a classic, "F for Fake" has a number of inspired moments and Welles plays with the preconceptions of the audience just enough to keep the film diverting. The documentaries included with "F for Fake" make this a must have particularly the glimpse into Welles' storage closet of unfinished films.

» Buy the DVD


Ask us about exclusive sponsorships


©  Critics Inc. All rights reserved. See Terms of Use.

 

AMAZON.COM